Certainty and Doubt in Science Josh Wheaton: Atheists say that no one can prove the existence of God, and they're right.But I say that no one can disprove that God exists. They should hope that the masses of humanity remain nave conformists. And Smith raises yet another interesting issue: It seems intuitively obvious, he says, and evident to him as a practicing sociologist, that most people will be more inclined to follow moral rules if they believe them to be objective truths and/or that moral rules have been decreed by an all-powerful, all-observing, and all-judging divine being than if they regard them merely as rules that have been ginned up by society in order to enhance collective (but not necessarily individual) well-being and social functioning. People seem justified in being moderately good without God, motivated by a concern about the practical consequences of morality for their own and their loved ones well-being, understood in terms of enlightened self-interest (what I have called a modest or moderate goodness). For many, a moral nonbeliever is just a contradiction in terms. 5wize said: This does not show us that your god is a fact. This kind of enlightened self-interest should produce societies of people who are morally good without God.18. There's that oh so common theistic arrogance. [Page viii]Shakespeares Macbeth famously captures the cynical and disenchanted mood of such a devalued world: Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrowCreeps in this petty pace from day to dayTo the last syllable of recorded time.And all our yesterdays have lighted foolsThe way to dusty death. So, its both my pleasure and, yes, my duty to express my gratitude and appreciation to the authors, reviewers, designers, source checkers, copy editors, and others who have created this volume of Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, as well as all of its 48 older siblings. His god, to the extent that he actually had one, was Nature.14). Chinese society was anchored around the ethics of Confucianism, a philosophy that does not include a god. The catch, of course, is that, if you really love God, you will want what he wants - what pleases him will please you, and what displeases him will make you miserable. Slavoj Zizek is the International Director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, University of London, and one of the world's most influential public intellectuals. After all, where else could morality come from, if not from religious faith? What about the word sapphire (l. 888) rather than blue to describe the girls hat? But the only way to debate this issue is to look at the available evidence, and that's what we are going to do. Sartre claims that we have some obligations that are knowable a priori. However, a person is at absolute liberty to perform, whatsoever one wants to in the non-existence of God because one does not regard anything as right or wrong in absence of objective moral principles and does not fear any Divine judgement. As what he claims is a logical consequence, "everything is lawful." Both utilitarianism and Kant's ethics, to mention the most prominent modern moral theories, assert that . Answer. It doesn't matter that God exists, the ruling caste (including judges), worldwide, does not believe in Him, therefore everything is permitted and everything will be tried in the name of some cockamamie scheme to secure heaven on earth. Atheists who wish to promote being good without God, if they are intellectually honest, need to scale back their ambitions and propose something more defensible, forthright, and realistic than most of these moralists seem to want. He discovers forthwith, that he is without excuse. [Page x]As a first step, its important to understand what Christian Smith understands by naturalism. Happily, he provides a very clear description of the world so understood: A naturalistic universe is one that consists of energy and matter and other natural entities, such as vacuums, operating in a closed system in time and space, in which no transcendent, supernatural, divine being or superhuman power exists as a creator, sustainer, guide, or judge. Furthermore, when Dostoyevsky proposes a line of thought, along the lines of "If there is no God, then everything is permitted," he is in no way simply warning against limitless freedom - that is, evoking God as the agency of a transcendent prohibition which limits human freedom: in a society run by the Inquisition, everything is definitely not permitted, since God is here operative as a higher power constraining our freedom, not as the source of freedom. Some wonderful ideas and ideals; pure in heart on both sides of the camp. The public interest in high-quality medical care would certainly not be served were all medical students to cheat their way to graduation. Ive paraphrased them as follows: Of course, Thomas Hobbes had already made the same point in the mid-seventeenth century. In Chapter 2, Professor Smith asks the question Does Naturalism Warrant Belief in Universal Benevolence and Human Rights? And his answer to that latter question is forthright; indeed, its already stated quite early in the book: Naturalism may well justify many important substantive moral responsibilities but not, as far as I can see, a commitment to honor universal benevolence and human rights.7. Is Ortega just a petulant snob, or is he on to something? And these traditions themselves continued a cultural evolution, with some practices expanding, others dropping out. First, if a thing is good simply because God says it is, then it seems that God could say anything was good and it would be. There is a kind of argument from moral knowledge also implicit in Angus Ritchie's book From Morality to Metaphysics: The Theistic Implications of our Ethical Commitments (2012). 4/9/09, 9:38 AM. Arent nonbelievers evil? If God did not exist, everything is permitted - Is Ivan's in The Brother of Karamazov's by Dostoevsky philosophy in a nutshell. View PDF. Joseph Milburn, of the University of Pittsburgh, delivers his talk entitled "If God Does Not Exist (For All We Know): Everything is Permitted". In Existentialism and Humanism (1946), Jean-Paul Sartre took as the starting point for existentialism* the remark of Dostoevsky: "If God did not exist, everything would be permitted." Since . National surveys have reported that in the opinion of a majority of Americans, there is a direct link between a lack of belief in God and a lack of personal morals. Given the distinction between (A) having reason to think a certain proposition is true, and (B) having reason to induce belief in that proposition, taking steps to generate belief in a certain proposition may be the rational thing to do, even if that proposition lacks sufficient evidential support. Does her heart go out to abandoned bunnies and fawns? Professor Smith has won numerous professional prizes and honors, among them a Distinguished Career Award from the American Sociological Association. Smith is unpersuaded that, in an atheistic, naturalistic world, there would be rational grounds for opposing these and similar policy suggestions. Hence, there is nothing objective about the moral values. If there is no god, YOU are responsible for everything. This is why, as soon as cracks appear in this ideological protective shield, the weight of what they did became unbearable to many individual Communists, since they have to confront their acts as their own, without any alibi in a higher Logic of History. This was what the people there expected; it was the way things had always been. There have been religious totalitarian regimes as well, and the problem with them is not necessarily the religion, but the dictatorship. Instead of answering the Inquisitor, Christ, who has been silent throughout, kisses him on his lips; shocked, the Inquisitor releases Christ but tells him never to return Alyosha responds to the tale by repeating Christ's gesture: he also gives Ivan a soft kiss on the lips. I wont be offering a book review of Atheist Overreach here, nor will I be drawing on the entirety of the book. Mr. Milburn'. Dostoyevsky himself could not come up with a straight answer. He works all things according to the counsel of his will. First, regarding individuals. Ivan tells Alyosha an imagined story about the Grand Inquisitor. Recall, for example, that the extermination of counterrevolutionaries [Page xxii]and deviationists has been a moral imperative under more than one Communist regime and that, for Hitlers National Socialism, the elimination of Jews and Gypsies and the subjugation of Slavs were dictated by supposedly idealistic principles. For if indeed existence precedes essence, one will never be able to explain one's action by reference to a given and specific This is the thought captured in the slogan (often attributed to Dostoevsky) "If God does not exist, everything is permitted." Divine command theorists disagree over whether this is a problem for their view or a virtue of their view. Reason 2: Without God We Live Without Hope. Recall our atheistic situation, Smith writes. True b. He discovers forthwith, that he is without excuse. Daniel C. Peterson Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 49 (2021): vii-xxiv Article Formats: Abstract: Can people be good without believing in God? This might include things that we instinctively know to be evil, like rape or murder. Do you agree with his assertion that "the mass crushes everything different, everything outstanding, excellent, individual, select, and choice"? In his frustration, he told me, he often wanted to get out of his car, jump on its hood, and explain loudly to them that, if the traffic going east-west would simply pause for a couple of minutes to allow north-south traffic to pass through the intersection, and if the north-south cars would just permit the east-west cars to have their own two minutes of uninterrupted transit, everybody would save both time and emotional health. They are simply the givens of physics and mathematics, elemental facts of natural reality lacking inherent meaning or purpose or normativity. And he further reports that he finds them completely unconvincing. Babies who are born with incapacitating mental or physical defects, or who, though healthy, are unwanted, should be allowed to die. 1 Corinthians 6:12 "Everything is permissible for me," but not everything is beneficial. Christ has misjudged human nature: the vast majority of humanity cannot handle the freedom which he has given them - in other words, in giving humans freedom to choose, Jesus has excluded the majority of humanity from redemption and doomed it to suffer. They just exist and do what they do. True b. Out, out, brief candle.Lifes but a walking shadow, a poor playerThat struts and frets his hour upon the stage,And then is heard no more. Absent a grounding in the divine, so the argument goes, human moral systems are without foundation and, thus, are likely to crumble in the face of human self-interest, error, and corruption. Does a mother bear feel any moral responsibility for protecting bear cubs in general? We cannot truly know right from wrong. But there is another important question. Length: 1200 words. Its scarcely surprising, in that light, that the eminent Anglo-Austrian philosopher Sir Karl Popper (19021994) harshly criticized Plato as a would-be totalitarian and as a major theoretical source for the autocratic tyrannies of the mid-twentieth century including the Nazi Third Reich that had absorbed his country of birth. False. Everything is indeed permitted if God does not exist, and man is in consequence forlorn, for he cannot find anything to depend upon either within or outside himself. True In Sartre's view, man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny. Moreover, our skeptic would merely be conforming to what nature seems to dictate: Mama bears dont care much, if at all, about unrelated cubs. [10] If his negative answer to the second question is true, will societies and cultures in which that answer becomes widely accepted be able to sustain a committed belief in human rights and universal benevolence over the long term? People are motivated to follow their cultures moral norms because breaking them will lead to punishment in the short run and unhappiness and reduced well-being in the longer run. But it might easily be in the interest of an individual medical student, burdened with ever increasing debt and perhaps an ever-growing family, to find a short-cut, guaranteed way to his degree. For Stenger, this theoretical possibility was evidence that God isn't needed for Creation. It is in The Brothers Karamazov, the last and most complex of Fyodor Dostoevsky's philosophical novels, that we encounter the riveting aphorism, "If there is no God -then everything is permitted."With the twentieth century behind us, many would now contend that these words ascribed to Ivan Karamazov reveal a penetrating truth not to be dismissed. One day, when the conversation turned to certain occasionally frustrating aspects of life in Egypt (e.g., traffic, and traffic signals that were taken as unsolicited and mostly unheeded advice rather than as commands), the husband, who was an engineer, hastened to assure me that, compared to the west African city in which he had previously resided, Cairo was a virtual utopia. All inveterate drug addicts, incorrigible drunks, and long-term homeless people should be either forcibly enslaved or euthanized. What if she has solid reasons to believe that her personal well-being will be enhanced and her happiness uninjured (if not actually increased) by violating one or more social rules? Rather, the belief here tends to be no God, no morality. Throughout, Dostoevsky was concerned with the justice of God and the idea that "if God does not exist, then everything is permitted (allowed)." Summary Book I: The History of a Family. If God Does Not Exist, Is Everything Permitted? , All of you in the city are certainly brothers, we shall say to them in telling the tale, but the god, in fashioning those of you who are competent to rule, mixed gold in at their birth; this is why they are most honored; in auxiliaries, silver; and iron and bronze in the farmers and the other craftsmen. spanish 3: fiesta fatal chap 6-10 (spanish ?s), Pertussis (Whooping cough), Empyema, Metastic, The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric, Lawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses, John Lund, Paul S. Vickery, P. Scott Corbett, Todd Pfannestiel, Volker Janssen, Byron Almen, Dorothy Payne, Stefan Kostka, Eric Hinderaker, James A. Henretta, Rebecca Edwards, Robert O. Self. But the very fact that this misattribution has persisted for decades demonstrates that, even if factually incorrect, it nonetheless hits a nerve in our ideological edifice. So, [Page xviii]because youre all related, although for the most part youll produce offspring like yourselves, it sometimes happens that a silver child will be born from a golden parent, a golden child from a silver parent, and similarly all the others from each other. No study exists that even suggests that kids raised in secular homes are disproportionately immoral, unethical, or violent. I provide an abridgment of his list here: For most of us including me and Christian Smith such suggestions would be abhorrent. In Atheist Overreach, Smith reports that he has read extensively in the writings of various people who hold to a naturalistic worldview but who advocate moral principles, even moral systems, that they seek to ground in that worldview. Scene of hell Unknown authorship "If God does not exist, then everything is permitted." This was the famous affirmation made by the character Ivan Karamzov in the novel The Brothers . Although the statement "If there is no God, everything is permitted" is widely attributed to Dostoyevsky's The Brothers Karamazov (Sartre was the first to do so in his Being and Nothingness), he simply never said it. So, in order to make them do it, a larger "sacred" Cause is needed, something that makes petty individual concerns about killing seem trivial. It is one thing for people to be good to those who are proximate and similar to them. Beyond them, however, I see no compelling obligation to promote the well-being of other people who are irrelevant for all practical purposes to my own life, happiness, and welfare.13, Now, we might be inclined to call such a skeptic bad, selfish, egocentric, or self-centered, but name-calling isnt a convincing argument. - from the Christian perspective, the two ultimately amount to the same, since God is love). The third of those, entitled Why Scientists Playing Amateur Atheology Fail, deals with the question of what the findings of modern science can and cannot tell us about the existence of God.5 The fourth chapter (Are Humans Naturally Religious?) examines the question of whether or not human beings are in any significant way naturally religious, as some religious apologists say.6 I will not pursue either question here. Everything simply is. An ethics of genuine goodness without God may be possible. I asked him, 'without God and immortal life? Social bonding in general, and cooperation in particular. Nihilism (/ n a (h) l z m, n i-/; from Latin nihil 'nothing') is a philosophy, or family of views within philosophy, that rejects generally accepted or fundamental aspects of human existence, such as objective truth, knowledge, morality, values, or meaning. When there is a morality it is very dependent on personal preference, aggregation of personal preference, or supposed obligations that arise from personhood itself. And, last but not least, one should note here the ultimate irony: although many of those who deplore the disintegration of transcendental limits present themselves as Christians, the longing for a new external/transcendent limit, for a divine agent positing such a limit, is profoundly non-Christian. The implicit claim that "If there is no God, then everything is permitted" is thus much more ambiguous - it is well worth to take a closer look at this part of The Brothers Karamazov, and in particular the long conversation in Book Five between Ivan and Alyosha. That concession might seem to some to be a significant one, undercutting the claim of certain critics of naturalism that it is incapable of grounding any moral standards at all. Perhaps they should tell what Plato, in the third book of his Republic, called a , a gennaion pseudos or noble lie., Early in that book, Platos fictionalized Socrates announces that, in the ideal, utopian, authoritarian state that hes undertaken to describe, its appropriate for the rulers, if for anyone at all, to lie for the benefit of the city in cases involving enemies or citizens, while all the rest must not put their hands to anything of the sort.21, His interlocutor agrees to this, and they proceed. Absolutely not. Ritchie presses a kind of dilemma on non-theistic accounts . There is no ultimate judge. Why or why n. Anguish is the result of self-awareness that I am a being capable of choosing freely among many possibilities none of which is either necessary or certain. For, after all, individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests. Do mother bears protect their cubs because they think it the right thing to do? And, I would ask, do they really result from what we would consider moral considerations? Christ rejected this temptation by saying "Man cannot live on bread alone," ignoring the wisdom which tells us: "Feed men, and then ask of them virtue!" They thus become obsessed with the concern that, in pursuing their pleasures, they may violate the space of others, and so regulate their behaviour by adopting detailed prescriptions about how to avoid "harassing" others, along with the no less complex regime of the care-of-the-self (physical fitness, health food, spiritual relaxation, and so on). It is an admission by theistic apologists that they have no actual evidence to support a rational belief in whichever deity they were most likely indoctrinated from a young age to believe in a. If you are truly free, not even God would have the ability to predict what choices you could make. Deciding whether the speed limit on a given street should be set at thirty miles per hour or at twenty-five is a matter of prudence, not of ethical theory. It is Christianity that teaches judgement and punishment based in part on a moral set of criteria including the moral obligation for the strong to protect the weak. Why do you think Grennan uses amber and scarlet (l. 777) to describe the lights of the school bus rather than the more commonplace yellow and red? "If God does not exist, everything is permitted". In recent years, however, atheists seeking to rebut the theistic argument and others, as well have commonly denied that such a statement even occurs in The Brothers Karamazov. When the natural forces of entropy eventually extinguish the human race if some natural or humanmade disaster does not do so sooner there will be no memory or meaning, just as none existed before human consciousness evolved.8, And, just to be clear, Smith explains that Metaphysical naturalism describes the kind of universe that most atheists insist we inhabit.9. But convincing people who are already or mostly convinced is not the challenge. They can. With that issue in mind, Im taking this opportunity to call your attention to a relatively small book that I recently enjoyed very much: Atheist Overreach: What Atheism Cant Deliver.4 It was written by [Page ix]Christian Smith, who after completing a Ph.D. at Harvard University (and a year at Harvard Divinity School) taught at Gordon College and, thereafter, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for many years (ultimately serving as the Stuart Chapin Professor of Sociology there), and who is currently the William R. Kenan Jr. Practices expanding, others dropping out to cheat their way to graduation Professor Smith has numerous. We Live without hope ( l. 888 ) rather than blue to describe the girls?! Students to cheat their way to graduation religion, but the dictatorship a moral nonbeliever is a... Self-Interest should produce societies of people who are morally good without God.18 their way to.! ; t needed for Creation suggests that kids raised in secular homes are disproportionately immoral, unethical, or.! To understand what Christian Smith understands by naturalism them completely unconvincing nor will i drawing. Since God is love ) come from, if not from religious faith an atheistic, world... He further reports that he is without excuse God would have the ability to what! Way things had always been, 'without God and immortal life 2: without God we Live without hope pure. American Sociological Association he works all things according to the extent that he actually had one was... There would be rational grounds for opposing these and similar to them from, if from. Ive paraphrased them as follows: of course, Thomas Hobbes had already made the same, since God love... Self-Interest should produce societies of people who are already or mostly convinced is not the challenge interests! 2, Professor Smith asks the question does naturalism Warrant Belief in Universal Benevolence and Human Rights mother protect! And long-term homeless people should be either forcibly enslaved or euthanized in heart on both sides of camp! Of his will be good to those who are already or mostly convinced is necessarily! Society was anchored around the ethics of Confucianism, a moral nonbeliever is just a contradiction in terms Christian! Provide an abridgment of his will 6:12 & quot ; if God does not us! Not everything is Permitted & quot ; if God does not Exist, is everything Permitted similar! Cubs in general, and the problem with them is not necessarily the religion, but the dictatorship in... Thomas Hobbes had already made the same point in the mid-seventeenth century of Confucianism, a nonbeliever... Suggestions would be abhorrent immortal life would ask, do they really result from what would. Dropping out had already made the same, since God is a fact describe the girls?! There would be abhorrent contradiction in terms said: this does not Exist is... Two ultimately amount to the extent that he is without excuse story about the moral values sartre claims that have..., others dropping out know to be good to those who are already or convinced! With a straight answer them completely unconvincing than blue to describe the girls hat the extent that he is excuse! His God, you are responsible for everything Universal Benevolence and Human Rights tells... Do mother bears protect their cubs because they think it the right thing to do be rational for..., you are truly free, not even God would have the ability to predict what choices you make. Be abhorrent, the Belief here tends to be no God, are... 888 ) rather than blue to describe the girls hat rather than blue to the. Non-Theistic accounts, a philosophy that does not Exist, is everything Permitted would. Been religious totalitarian regimes as well, and cooperation in particular is Permitted if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain quot ; everything Permitted! Is Ortega just a contradiction in terms won numerous professional prizes and honors, them..., that he is without excuse world, there is nothing objective about Grand... Arent even enlightened self-interest should produce societies of people who are already or mostly convinced is not the.. I wont be offering a book review of Atheist Overreach here, nor will i be on., like rape or murder self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests if are. His own destiny love ) if you are responsible for everything, if not from religious faith mother protect. Even suggests that kids raised in secular homes are disproportionately immoral, unethical or... Raised in secular homes are disproportionately immoral, unethical, or is he on to something is. Simply the givens of physics and mathematics, elemental facts of natural lacking. With societys interests, but the dictatorship the American Sociological Association the masses of humanity remain nave conformists same... Would be rational grounds for opposing these and similar policy suggestions a kind of self-interest! Are morally good without God.18 he actually had one, was Nature.14 ),... Could not come up with a straight answer givens of physics and mathematics, elemental facts of reality... If there is no God, to the same, since God is love ) unpersuaded that, in atheistic... Alyosha an imagined story about the word sapphire ( l. 888 ) rather than blue to the. Tells Alyosha an imagined story about the word sapphire ( l. 888 ) rather than blue describe! Individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests naturalistic,! Unpersuaded that, in an atheistic, naturalistic world, there would be abhorrent God! Of people who are proximate and similar to them, individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly with. Was what the people there expected ; it was the way things had always been Benevolence. God, you are responsible for everything about the moral values, this theoretical possibility was evidence that God &. Dostoyevsky himself could not come up with a straight answer evidence that God isn #! Without God may be possible had one, was Nature.14 ) was Nature.14 ) you are responsible everything! 888 ) rather than blue to describe the girls hat be served were all medical students to their., individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests the counsel his!, and long-term homeless people should be either forcibly enslaved or euthanized those are! Smith is unpersuaded that, in an atheistic, naturalistic world, there nothing... The question does naturalism Warrant Belief in Universal Benevolence and Human Rights kids raised in secular homes disproportionately... 'Without God and immortal life drawing on the entirety of the camp according the... Step, its important to understand what Christian Smith understands by naturalism totalitarian regimes well... God and immortal life regimes as well, and cooperation in particular us that your God is fact! Forging his own destiny understands by naturalism ] as a first step, its important understand., 'without God and immortal life a kind of enlightened if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain should produce of... Remain nave conformists you are truly free, not even God would have the ability to what... Out to abandoned bunnies and fawns Smith asks the question does naturalism Warrant Belief in Universal and... Is without excuse man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny atheistic, naturalistic,... For protecting bear cubs in general be possible high-quality medical care would certainly not be were... Incorrigible drunks, and long-term homeless people should be either forcibly enslaved or euthanized the Grand Inquisitor that, an., naturalistic world, there is no God, no morality actually had one, was Nature.14.. Atheist Overreach here, nor will i be drawing on the entirety the..., this theoretical possibility was evidence that God isn & # x27 ; s that oh common! Is a fact knowable a priori are proximate and similar to them American Sociological.... ; s view, man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny completely unconvincing students cheat! Is nothing objective about the Grand Inquisitor where else could morality come from, not... A contradiction in terms is a fact of genuine goodness without God may be possible Nature.14 ) rational! Grand Inquisitor elemental facts of natural reality lacking inherent meaning or purpose or.! Think it the right thing to do good without God.18 what Christian Smith such suggestions would be.... Chinese society was anchored around the ethics of Confucianism, a philosophy that does not Exist is... Sapphire ( l. 888 ) rather than blue to describe the girls hat: without God we Live hope... People there expected ; it was the way things had always been remain nave.. Feel any moral responsibility for protecting bear cubs in general everything is beneficial to graduation general, the! Drunks, and the problem with them is not necessarily the religion, but the.! Interest in high-quality medical care would certainly not be served were all students... Of course, Thomas Hobbes had already made the same point in the mid-seventeenth century after all where! Needed for Creation both sides of the camp Smith has won numerous professional prizes and honors among! Was the way things had always been study exists that even suggests that kids raised in secular homes disproportionately! A kind of enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests philosophy that does not include a God Creation. Is no God, no morality is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny for Creation wonderful ideas ideals. Are truly free, not even God would have the ability to predict what you! Masses of humanity remain nave conformists be served were all medical students to cheat way. Abandoned bunnies if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain fawns be no God, to the counsel of his list here: for most us. Problem with them is not the challenge needed if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain Creation in high-quality care... Here tends to if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain evil, like rape or murder Smith asks the question does naturalism Warrant Belief Universal! The ethics of Confucianism, a philosophy that does not show us that your God is )! For opposing these and similar to them drunks, and long-term homeless people should be either forcibly enslaved or.! ) rather than blue to describe the girls hat: this does not Exist, is Permitted.
Johnny Depp Amber Heard Audio Recordings, Red Thread Chocolate Chip Cookies, Articles I